Skip the theory. This is the exact filing playbook MSME borrowers use to invoke the RBI 8 June 2023 compromise-settlement framework and close a One-Time Settlement in 90–150 days.
The RBI OTS framework is not a benefit you claim — it is a route you file. Every scheduled commercial bank must have a Board-approved compromise-settlement policy (RBI circular DOR.STR.REC.20/21.04.048/2023-24 dated 8 June 2023). Your job as an MSME borrower is to file a proposal that fits inside that policy, not to argue the policy itself.
In practice, banks sanction OTS at waivers of 35–70% of the total outstanding depending on NPA vintage, security cover and realistic recovery value. The number is not negotiated on emotion; it is negotiated against the bank's own internal Recovery Value Statement (RVS). Once you understand what number the bank has already written down, you know what to offer.
This page is a working checklist: what qualifies, what to file, who to file it with, what the bank does internally, and how to close the file without leaving guarantor or CIBIL exposure open.
Free Assessment
30-minute confidential case review
A senior consultant reviews your outstanding, NPA stage and options — no obligation, no cost. All conversations are covered by NDA.
• Waiver band estimate for your case
• Best-fit authority / branch to file at
• Risk of SARFAESI / auction escalation
• Documentation checklist
Legal background — what actually governs this
Three documents run this process, and only three. First: RBI's 8 June 2023 Framework for Compromise Settlements & Technical Write-offs — it forces every regulated lender to have a written policy and to apply it consistently. Second: your bank's own Board-approved compromise-settlement policy — this is the document you are actually negotiating against, and you can (and should) ask for the relevant extract in writing. Third: your sanction letter and security documents — these define what the bank can enforce if you don't settle. Everything else (SARFAESI, DRT, IBC) is background pressure, not the settlement instrument itself. Keep the file narrow: RBI framework → bank policy → your proposal → sanction letter → agreement → No Dues Certificate.
This page is educational and is not legal or financial advice. Every bank evaluates settlement individually and each case turns on its own facts.
Applicable RBI framework & guidance
The following RBI and statutory instruments are the primary reference points for this topic. Frameworks are directional; individual banks translate them into Board-approved policies.
RBI Framework for Compromise Settlements & Technical Write-offs, 8 June 2023 — the core enabling framework; mandates Board-approved policy, borrower-fairness, and disclosure at every bank/NBFC.
RBI Master Direction on MSMEs (updated) — restructuring windows, priority-sector treatment and reporting for MSME accounts.
RBI Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets, 7 June 2019 — governs restructuring before NPA classification hardens.
SARFAESI Act, 2002 — the enforcement clock (Section 13(2) demand → 60 days → 13(4) possession → 30-day sale notice) that OTS is used to stop.
Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 — DRT/DRAT track; OTS can be recorded as consent terms at any stage.
How banks actually apply this in practice
Every bank has the same internal machinery: a Recovery Value Statement (RVS) is prepared → the file moves to a committee (branch → regional → zonal → HO / SAM depending on ticket size) → the committee sanctions a waiver band → a settlement letter is issued → you pay per the schedule → a No Dues Certificate is released. Ticket size drives the ladder: below ~₹25 lakh usually clears at regional level in 30–60 days; ₹25 lakh–₹5 Cr goes to zonal (60–90 days); above ₹5 Cr moves to HO / Stressed Assets Management with 90–150 day cycles. A proposal that already speaks in the bank's template language (RVS-anchored, principal-first, upfront deposit + tail EMIs) moves 30–60 days faster than a free-form request letter.
Eligibility
Account classified as SMA-2, NPA sub-standard, doubtful or loss asset
Not tagged as wilful default or fraud
Realistic source of funds for at least the down-payment tranche
Willingness to sign a full and final settlement with the bank
Promoter/guarantor cooperation in documentation and negotiation
No parallel criminal / recovery proceedings that block settlement
Standard Documentation
• Latest sanction letter and all amendments / renewals
No Dues Certificate, security release, CIBIL update.
What the framework says vs. what banks actually approve
Point
RBI framework says
What banks actually do
Who can apply
Any borrower per Board-approved policy
Non-wilful MSME accounts in SMA-2 / NPA / written-off
Waiver quantum
Not prescribed — bank discretion
35–50% for sub-standard, 50–70% for doubtful/loss/written-off
Payment terms
Board-approved policy governs
10–25% upfront, balance in 3–12 months
Sanction timeline
Not prescribed
30–60 days (regional) · 60–90 (zonal) · 90–150 (HO/SAM)
Cooling period for fresh credit
Minimum 12 months from settlement
12–24 months at same bank; other lenders vary
Guarantor discharge
Silent — contractual matter
Must be explicitly written into the settlement agreement
CIBIL reporting
Report as 'Settled'
Entry stays 3 years post-payment; repairable via disciplined rebuild
Settlement Calculator (Indicative)
Rough waiver band based on NPA stage. Actual outcome depends on bank, RVS, DPD and negotiation.
Estimated waiver band: 55%–70%
Indicative payable: ₹15,00,000 – ₹22,50,000
OTS Eligibility Checker
Quick 4-question check. Not a formal opinion.
Needs review — some flags reduce OTS eligibility. Speak with a consultant.
Advantages
The practical upside of getting this right for an MSME borrower:
Framework exists — bank cannot say 'we don't do settlements'
Waiver bands of 35–70% are routine for genuine MSME defaults
Auction / SARFAESI clock pauses once OTS is under sanction
Consistent process across all scheduled commercial banks
Guarantor discharge can be structured into the same agreement
CIBIL entry becomes 'Settled', which is repairable in 24–36 months
Limitations & caveats
Where this route does not help, or helps less than borrowers expect:
Wilful default tagging blocks OTS at most banks
Waiver of principal (not just interest) triggers Section 41(1) tax exposure
Bank retains full commercial discretion — no automatic entitlement
Verbal assurances by branch staff are not binding — only sanction letter is
Interest keeps accruing until the sanction letter is issued
Partial informal payments before sanction weaken your negotiating position
Mistakes to avoid
The recurring errors that either delay resolution or reduce the eventual waiver:
Offering a lump-sum figure without seeing the RVS
Making 'goodwill' part-payments before written sanction
Missing the 60-day Section 13(2) SARFAESI response window
Filing the proposal at branch level when ticket size requires zonal / HO
Signing the settlement agreement without explicit guarantor discharge
Ignoring Form 26AS / Section 41(1) tax planning until after payment
Treating a written-off account as unsettlable — it isn't
Case Studies
Textile unit — ₹2.4 Cr, sub-standard NPA
Surat weaving unit, account in NPA for 14 months. Filed OTS at ₹96 lakh (40% of book) anchored to the bank's own RVS of ₹88 lakh. Zonal committee sanctioned in 71 days. 20% upfront, balance in 6 monthly instalments. Personal guarantor discharged in the same agreement.
Auto-component workshop — ₹85 lakh, written-off
Pune auto-component workshop, written off 3 years earlier. Filed OTS at ₹22 lakh (26% of book). SAM sanctioned in 44 days. Full payment in 90 days; No Dues Certificate with explicit guarantor release.
Cold storage — ₹6.2 Cr, SARFAESI 13(4) stage
Ludhiana cold-storage facility, possession notice already issued. Structured OTS at ₹2.85 Cr (46%) with 15% upfront and balance in 9 months against a lien on adjacent land. Auction stayed on sanction; HO cycle took 118 days.
Client Voices
"Filed clean OTS with the right authority. Sanctioned in 4 months at 62% waiver."
"Timely SARFAESI reply and structured OTS saved the shop unit. Closed with No Dues in 5 months."
"Post-13(4) proposal filed with SAM branch — auction stayed and settled at 68% waiver."
Frequently Asked Questions
Expert recommendations
Three moves change outcomes more than anything else. (1) File in writing — every proposal, every response, every reminder — and always to a named officer, not a generic branch address. (2) Anchor to the bank's RVS: if the bank's own internal recovery estimate is ₹40 lakh on a ₹1 Cr book, a ₹45 lakh OTS is not a discount, it is a premium the committee can defend. (3) Close the guarantor in the same agreement — a settlement that releases the borrower entity but leaves the personal guarantee live is not a settlement, it is a deferred lawsuit. Beyond that: keep the CIBIL rebuild plan ready before you sign, because the first 12 months post-settlement are when a disciplined borrower can recover a 100+ point score improvement.
Related RBI circulars & frameworks
Frameworks and circulars referenced on this page:
• RBI Framework for Compromise Settlements & Technical Write-offs — 8 June 2023
• RBI Master Direction on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (updated)
• RBI Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets — 7 June 2019
• SARFAESI Act, 2002 and Enforcement Rules, 2002
• Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993